சுவிசேஷங்கள்க் கதைகளை இயற்றிய கதாசிரியர்கள் யார்?

சுவிசேஷக் கதை ஏசு வரலாற்றில் வாழ்ந்த மனிதரா?

கிறிஸ்து மத புராண நாயகன் பற்றிய அனைத்து கதைகளின்  ஒரே தரவு ஆன  புதிய ஏற்பாடு விவிலிய (பைபிள்) நூல்களை ஆராய்ந்த பன்னாட்டு பல்கலைக் கழக விவிலிய அறிஞர் கருத்து ஒற்றுமை.

"The earliest witnesses wrote nothing’ there is not a Single book in the New Testament which is the direct work of an eyewitness of the Historical Jesus." Page-197, -A Critical Introduction to New Testament. Reginald H.f. Fuller. Professor OF New Testament, Union Theological Seminary NewYork

 

It seems that Mark's gospel was the first published account of the life, work and death of Jesus and it soon became an accepted work, forming the basis of the Gospel ofMatthew and Luke; and was also known to the writer  of the 4th Gospel-  Page- 195, Who's who in the New Testament.  

But its contents (of Gospel according to Matthew) seem to show it to be the work Neither of an Apostle nor of an Eye-witness. Page-195, WWNT

 Matthew used them(Prophecies) indpendently of their original context inwhat may seem to be a somewhat artificiala fashion, showing their fulfilment in Jesus - Page-196, WWNT

To Mark's narrative Matthew adds the Historically dubious stories of the Earthquake and resurrection of the Jewish Saints and the sealing of the Tombs- -page133, The Works and Words of Jesus, Prof.A.M.Hunter.

Jesus was born before the death of Heor(4 BC) where as the only Census known in the period took place 10 - 13 years later, while Quirinius was Roman Governor of Syria. This has suggested the alternative theory that Jesus was a Galilean, was born in Nazareth, thestory of birth in David's city of Bethlehem beingdeveloped later to justify the claim that it fulfilled the Prophecy of Micah 5: 2 - 5 that the Messiah was to issue from the House of David. Page-449, Macmillan's Pictorial Biblical Encyclopedia (Editor- Gaalyahu Cornfled whose other prominent books include -"Archaeology of the Bible" and "The Historical Jesus")

அதாவது ஏசுவுடன் பழகியோர் ஏதும் எழுதி வைக்கவில்லை; புதிய ஏற்பாட்டு நூல்கள் 27ல் ஒன்று கூட வரலாற்று ஏசுவினோடு பழகிய யாரும் எழுதியது இல்லை, என அமெரிக்க நூயுயார்க் பைபிளியல் பேராசிரியர் ரெஜினால்ட் புல்லர் தன் நூலில் உறிதி செய்கிறார். 

“None of the Sources of his Life can be Traced on to Jesus himself. He did not leave a Single Known Written Word. Also there are no Contemporary Accounts of Jesus’s Life and Death” – Vol-22, Pg.336 Encyclopedia Britanica.

On Mark, Papias cites John the Elder: The Elder used to say: Mark, in his capacity as Peter’s interpreter, wrote down accurately as many things as he recalled from memory—though not in an ordered form—of the things either said or done by the Lord. For he neither heard the Lord nor accompanied him, but later, as I said, Peter, who used to give his teachings in the form of chreiai, but had no intention of providing an ordered arrangement of the logia of the Lord. Consequently Mark did nothing wrong when he wrote down some individual items just as he related them from memory. For he made it his one concern not to omit anything he had heard or to falsify anything.